diff options
author | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2009-04-02 19:57:38 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-04-02 22:04:55 -0400 |
commit | 0b7f569e45bb6be142d87017030669a6a7d327a1 (patch) | |
tree | 8df7877b95c093ebf4cb4e1006cea16f75fc79b7 /Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt | |
parent | 81d39c20f5ee2437d71709beb82597e2a38efbbc (diff) |
memcg: fix OOM killer under memcg
This patch tries to fix OOM Killer problems caused by hierarchy.
Now, memcg itself has OOM KILL function (in oom_kill.c) and tries to
kill a task in memcg.
But, when hierarchy is used, it's broken and correct task cannot
be killed. For example, in following cgroup
/groupA/ hierarchy=1, limit=1G,
01 nolimit
02 nolimit
All tasks' memory usage under /groupA, /groupA/01, groupA/02 is limited to
groupA's 1Gbytes but OOM Killer just kills tasks in groupA.
This patch provides makes the bad process be selected from all tasks
under hierarchy. BTW, currently, oom_jiffies is updated against groupA
in above case. oom_jiffies of tree should be updated.
To see how oom_jiffies is used, please check mem_cgroup_oom_called()
callers.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: const fix]
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt | 20 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt index 523a9c16c400..8a11caf417a0 100644 --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memcg_test.txt | |||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
1 | Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo. | 1 | Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo. |
2 | Last Updated: 2009/1/19 | 2 | Last Updated: 2009/1/20 |
3 | Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.29-rc2. | 3 | Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.29-rc2. |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior | 5 | Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior |
@@ -360,3 +360,21 @@ Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y. | |||
360 | # kill malloc task. | 360 | # kill malloc task. |
361 | 361 | ||
362 | Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too. | 362 | Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too. |
363 | |||
364 | 9.8 OOM-Killer | ||
365 | Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under | ||
366 | the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy | ||
367 | will be killed by the kernel. | ||
368 | In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks | ||
369 | in other groups shouldn't be killed. | ||
370 | |||
371 | It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following. | ||
372 | Case A) when you can swapoff | ||
373 | #swapoff -a | ||
374 | #echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes | ||
375 | run 51M of malloc | ||
376 | |||
377 | Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation. | ||
378 | #echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes | ||
379 | #echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes | ||
380 | run 51M of malloc | ||