aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2007-06-08 16:46:45 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2007-06-08 20:23:32 -0400
commit0f44cd23a5a2e26191a28ab6e91bd0c7849c8e0f (patch)
tree7cb971c18e4bf6784ea0ca1826fdb425effbeba9 /Documentation/SubmittingPatches
parenta47653fc2643cf61bcabba8c9ff5c45517c089ba (diff)
document Acked-by:
Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by: Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/SubmittingPatches')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/SubmittingPatches26
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index d91125ab6f49..0958e97d4bf4 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -340,8 +340,32 @@ now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just
340point out some special detail about the sign-off. 340point out some special detail about the sign-off.
341 341
342 342
34313) When to use Acked-by:
343 344
34413) The canonical patch format 345The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
346development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
347
348If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
349patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
350arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
351
352Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that
353maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch.
354
355Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
356has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch
357mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
358into an Acked-by:.
359
360Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch.
361For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from
362one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just
363the part which affects that maintainer's code. Judgement should be used here.
364 When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing
365list archives.
366
367
36814) The canonical patch format
345 369
346The canonical patch subject line is: 370The canonical patch subject line is:
347 371