rcu: Update docs to include kfree_rcu()

Mention kfree_rcu() in the call_rcu() section.  Additionally fix the
example code for list replacement that used the wrong structure element.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index bf0f6de2aa00..160ac5557e97 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ The foo_reclaim() function might appear as follows:
         {
                 struct foo *fp = container_of(rp, struct foo, rcu);
 
+                foo_cleanup(fp->a);
+
                 kfree(fp);
         }
 
@@ -521,6 +523,12 @@ o	Use call_rcu() -after- removing a data element from an
         read-side critical sections that might be referencing that
         data item.
 
+If the callback for call_rcu() is not doing anything more than calling
+kfree() on the structure, you can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()
+to avoid having to write your own callback:
+
+        kfree_rcu(old_fp, rcu);
+
 Again, see checklist.txt for additional rules governing the use of RCU.
 
 
@@ -773,8 +781,8 @@ a single atomic update, converting to RCU will require special care.
 
 Also, the presence of synchronize_rcu() means that the RCU version of
 delete() can now block.  If this is a problem, there is a callback-based
-mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu(), that can be used in
-place of synchronize_rcu().
+mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu() or kfree_rcu(), that can
+be used in place of synchronize_rcu().
 
 
 7.  FULL LIST OF RCU APIs
@@ -813,6 +821,7 @@ RCU:	Critical sections	Grace period		Barrier
         rcu_read_unlock         synchronize_rcu
         rcu_dereference         synchronize_rcu_expedited
                                 call_rcu
+                                kfree_rcu
 
 
 bh:     Critical sections       Grace period            Barrier