aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2011-03-17 15:32:49 -0400
committerGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>2011-03-17 15:49:03 -0400
commit20e2aa916f6b56e6b1d9e34f4c6e8183d27cb81f (patch)
treed7e73c2d4ca788208b54ad5b82a9c3128f15a5d5
parent61ab3fe57e45f365caf73d567926040bdb475217 (diff)
gpio/langwell: Fix broken irq_eoi change.
commit 0766d20fd (langwell_gpio: modify EOI handling following change of kernel irq subsystem) changes - desc->chip->eoi(irq); + + if (desc->chip->irq_eoi) + desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq)); + else + dev_warn(pg->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq); With the following explanation: "Latest kernel has many changes in IRQ subsystem and its interfaces, like adding irq_eoi" for struct irq_chip, this patch will make it support both the new and old interface." This is completely bogus. #1) The changelog does not match the patch at all #2) This driver relies on the assumption that it sits behind an eoi capable interrupt line. If the implementation of the underlying chip changes from eoi to irq_eoi then this driver has to follow that change and not add a total bogosity. #3) Just mechanically changing eoi to irq_eoi without checking the background of that change is sloppy at best. Remove the sillyness and retrieve the interrupt data from irq_desc directly. No need to go through a sparse irq lookup. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c13
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
index 54d70a47afc1..bb10156422e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
@@ -187,10 +187,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, lnw_gpio_ids);
187 187
188static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc) 188static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
189{ 189{
190 struct lnw_gpio *lnw = get_irq_data(irq); 190 struct irq_data *data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
191 u32 base, gpio; 191 struct lnw_gpio *lnw = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
192 struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
193 u32 base, gpio, gedr_v;
192 void __iomem *gedr; 194 void __iomem *gedr;
193 u32 gedr_v;
194 195
195 /* check GPIO controller to check which pin triggered the interrupt */ 196 /* check GPIO controller to check which pin triggered the interrupt */
196 for (base = 0; base < lnw->chip.ngpio; base += 32) { 197 for (base = 0; base < lnw->chip.ngpio; base += 32) {
@@ -207,11 +208,7 @@ static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
207 writel(gedr_v, gedr); 208 writel(gedr_v, gedr);
208 } 209 }
209 210
210 if (desc->chip->irq_eoi) 211 chip->irq_eoi(data);
211 desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
212 else
213 dev_warn(lnw->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq);
214
215} 212}
216 213
217static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, 214static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,