aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>2009-03-22 20:57:38 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2009-03-26 14:01:11 -0400
commit1b5e62b42b55c509eea04c3c0f25e42c8b35b564 (patch)
treebe5d783ec67610445828e496706f1e02c74671c1
parent0a1c01c9477602ee8b44548a9405b2c1d587b5a2 (diff)
writeback: double the dirty thresholds
Enlarge default dirty ratios from 5/10 to 10/20. This fixes [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6. The iozone benchmarks are performed on a 1200M file, with 8GB ram. iozone -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 3 -i 4 -r 4k -s 64k -s 512m -s 1200m -b tmp.xls iozone -B -r 4k -s 64k -s 512m -s 1200m -b tmp.xls The performance regression is triggered by commit 1cf6e7d83bf3(mm: task dirty accounting fix), which makes more correct/thorough dirty accounting. The default 5/10 dirty ratios were picked (a) with the old dirty logic and (b) largely at random and (c) designed to be aggressive. In particular, that (a) means that having fixed some of the dirty accounting, maybe the real bug is now that it was always too aggressive, just hidden by an accounting issue. The enlarged 10/20 dirty ratios are just about enough to fix the regression. [ We will have to look at how this affects the old fsync() latency issue, but that probably will need independent work. - Linus ] Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reported-by: "Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Tested-by: "Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/page-writeback.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 74dc57c74349..40ca7cdb653e 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline long sync_writeback_pages(void)
66/* 66/*
67 * Start background writeback (via pdflush) at this percentage 67 * Start background writeback (via pdflush) at this percentage
68 */ 68 */
69int dirty_background_ratio = 5; 69int dirty_background_ratio = 10;
70 70
71/* 71/*
72 * dirty_background_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of 72 * dirty_background_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ int vm_highmem_is_dirtyable;
83/* 83/*
84 * The generator of dirty data starts writeback at this percentage 84 * The generator of dirty data starts writeback at this percentage
85 */ 85 */
86int vm_dirty_ratio = 10; 86int vm_dirty_ratio = 20;
87 87
88/* 88/*
89 * vm_dirty_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of 89 * vm_dirty_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of