aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDenis Lunev <den@openvz.org>2007-04-18 20:05:58 -0400
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2007-04-18 20:05:58 -0400
commitac57b3a9ce280763296f99e32187a0b4384d9389 (patch)
tree5aa81b60abfe3436a5d7d52a93a9c5cb9b9d71a5
parentbfb6709d0b239af5e3ce5859aae926e1b79ba84b (diff)
[NETLINK]: Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket
There is a race between netlink_dump_start() and netlink_release() that can lead to the situation when a netlink socket with non-zero callback is freed. Here it is: CPU1: CPU2 netlink_release(): netlink_dump_start(): sk = netlink_lookup(); /* OK */ netlink_remove(); spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock); if (nlk->cb) { /* false */ ... } spin_unlock(&nlk->cb_lock); spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock); if (nlk->cb) { /* false */ ... } nlk->cb = cb; spin_unlock(&nlk->cb_lock); ... sock_orphan(sk); /* * proceed with releasing * the socket */ The proposal it to make sock_orphan before detaching the callback in netlink_release() and to check for the sock to be SOCK_DEAD in netlink_dump_start() before setting a new callback. Signed-off-by: Denis Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--net/netlink/af_netlink.c6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index e73d8f546c6b..c48b0f49f003 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
443 return 0; 443 return 0;
444 444
445 netlink_remove(sk); 445 netlink_remove(sk);
446 sock_orphan(sk);
446 nlk = nlk_sk(sk); 447 nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
447 448
448 spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock); 449 spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock);
@@ -457,7 +458,6 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
457 /* OK. Socket is unlinked, and, therefore, 458 /* OK. Socket is unlinked, and, therefore,
458 no new packets will arrive */ 459 no new packets will arrive */
459 460
460 sock_orphan(sk);
461 sock->sk = NULL; 461 sock->sk = NULL;
462 wake_up_interruptible_all(&nlk->wait); 462 wake_up_interruptible_all(&nlk->wait);
463 463
@@ -1412,9 +1412,9 @@ int netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
1412 return -ECONNREFUSED; 1412 return -ECONNREFUSED;
1413 } 1413 }
1414 nlk = nlk_sk(sk); 1414 nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
1415 /* A dump is in progress... */ 1415 /* A dump or destruction is in progress... */
1416 spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock); 1416 spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock);
1417 if (nlk->cb) { 1417 if (nlk->cb || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
1418 spin_unlock(&nlk->cb_lock); 1418 spin_unlock(&nlk->cb_lock);
1419 netlink_destroy_callback(cb); 1419 netlink_destroy_callback(cb);
1420 sock_put(sk); 1420 sock_put(sk);