aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>2013-02-22 19:33:22 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2013-02-23 20:50:13 -0500
commitd3eb1570a9221b1b3ea8f6f460a9674c1bb761f1 (patch)
tree35792d7c35ba7012ea8d43bf5243e04a6b90323f
parent8a356ce38e134b3b09b439e88dc770f8f5567648 (diff)
mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask()
is_valid_nodemask() was introduced by commit 19770b32609b ("mm: filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask"). but it does not match its comments, because it does not check the zone which > policy_zone. Also in commit b377fd3982ad ("Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE"), this commits told us, if highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE, we should also apply memory policies to it. so ZONE_MOVABLE should be valid zone for policies. is_valid_nodemask() need to be changed to match it. Fix: check all zones, even its zoneid > policy_zone. Use nodes_intersects() instead open code to check it. Reported-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com> Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/mempolicy.c36
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index e2df1c1fb41f..6f7979c566d9 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -161,19 +161,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations {
161/* Check that the nodemask contains at least one populated zone */ 161/* Check that the nodemask contains at least one populated zone */
162static int is_valid_nodemask(const nodemask_t *nodemask) 162static int is_valid_nodemask(const nodemask_t *nodemask)
163{ 163{
164 int nd, k; 164 return nodes_intersects(*nodemask, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
165
166 for_each_node_mask(nd, *nodemask) {
167 struct zone *z;
168
169 for (k = 0; k <= policy_zone; k++) {
170 z = &NODE_DATA(nd)->node_zones[k];
171 if (z->present_pages > 0)
172 return 1;
173 }
174 }
175
176 return 0;
177} 165}
178 166
179static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol) 167static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
@@ -1644,6 +1632,26 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
1644 return pol; 1632 return pol;
1645} 1633}
1646 1634
1635static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
1636{
1637 enum zone_type dynamic_policy_zone = policy_zone;
1638
1639 BUG_ON(dynamic_policy_zone == ZONE_MOVABLE);
1640
1641 /*
1642 * if policy->v.nodes has movable memory only,
1643 * we apply policy when gfp_zone(gfp) = ZONE_MOVABLE only.
1644 *
1645 * policy->v.nodes is intersect with node_states[N_MEMORY].
1646 * so if the following test faile, it implies
1647 * policy->v.nodes has movable memory only.
1648 */
1649 if (!nodes_intersects(policy->v.nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
1650 dynamic_policy_zone = ZONE_MOVABLE;
1651
1652 return zone >= dynamic_policy_zone;
1653}
1654
1647/* 1655/*
1648 * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for 1656 * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for
1649 * page allocation 1657 * page allocation
@@ -1652,7 +1660,7 @@ static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
1652{ 1660{
1653 /* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */ 1661 /* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */
1654 if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) && 1662 if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) &&
1655 gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone && 1663 apply_policy_zone(policy, gfp_zone(gfp)) &&
1656 cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->v.nodes)) 1664 cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->v.nodes))
1657 return &policy->v.nodes; 1665 return &policy->v.nodes;
1658 1666