aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>2012-11-16 17:14:59 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2012-11-16 17:33:04 -0500
commit96710098ee124951ff2fed7cd8406da92aad011a (patch)
tree9f1f450a38f04e9c989df6ed57c61056f1f943c5
parent2ca3cb50edc351875df13d083524f524cdeb3054 (diff)
mm: revert "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures"
Jiri Slaby reported the following: (It's an effective revert of "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures".) Given kswapd had hours of runtime in ps/top output yesterday in the morning and after the revert it's now 2 minutes in sum for the last 24h, I would say, it's gone. The intention of the patch in question was to compensate for the loss of lumpy reclaim. Part of the reason lumpy reclaim worked is because it aggressively reclaimed pages and this patch was meant to be a sane compromise. When compaction fails, it gets deferred and both compaction and reclaim/compaction is deferred avoid excessive reclaim. However, since commit c654345924f7 ("mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"), kswapd is woken up each time and continues reclaiming which was not taken into account when the patch was developed. Attempts to address the problem ended up just changing the shape of the problem instead of fixing it. The release window gets closer and while a THP allocation failing is not a major problem, kswapd chewing up a lot of CPU is. This patch reverts commit 83fde0f22872 ("mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures") and will be revisited in the future. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c25
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8b055e9379bc..48550c66f1f2 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1760,28 +1760,6 @@ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc)
1760 return false; 1760 return false;
1761} 1761}
1762 1762
1763#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
1764/*
1765 * If compaction is deferred for sc->order then scale the number of pages
1766 * reclaimed based on the number of consecutive allocation failures
1767 */
1768static unsigned long scale_for_compaction(unsigned long pages_for_compaction,
1769 struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
1770{
1771 struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
1772
1773 if (zone->compact_order_failed <= sc->order)
1774 pages_for_compaction <<= zone->compact_defer_shift;
1775 return pages_for_compaction;
1776}
1777#else
1778static unsigned long scale_for_compaction(unsigned long pages_for_compaction,
1779 struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
1780{
1781 return pages_for_compaction;
1782}
1783#endif
1784
1785/* 1763/*
1786 * Reclaim/compaction is used for high-order allocation requests. It reclaims 1764 * Reclaim/compaction is used for high-order allocation requests. It reclaims
1787 * order-0 pages before compacting the zone. should_continue_reclaim() returns 1765 * order-0 pages before compacting the zone. should_continue_reclaim() returns
@@ -1829,9 +1807,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct lruvec *lruvec,
1829 * inactive lists are large enough, continue reclaiming 1807 * inactive lists are large enough, continue reclaiming
1830 */ 1808 */
1831 pages_for_compaction = (2UL << sc->order); 1809 pages_for_compaction = (2UL << sc->order);
1832
1833 pages_for_compaction = scale_for_compaction(pages_for_compaction,
1834 lruvec, sc);
1835 inactive_lru_pages = get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE); 1810 inactive_lru_pages = get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
1836 if (nr_swap_pages > 0) 1811 if (nr_swap_pages > 0)
1837 inactive_lru_pages += get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); 1812 inactive_lru_pages += get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);