mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap

In ext4_new_blocks(), one of two ext4_block_bitmap() calls should be
ext4_inode_bitmap() call.  It is not harmful in normal processing, but it
should be fixed.

Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index 3b64bb16c727..9de54ae48dee 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ allocated:
         ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no);
 
         if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
-            in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
+            in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
             in_range(ret_block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
                      EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
             in_range(ret_block + num - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),