sched: call update_curr() in task_tick_fair()

update the fair-clock before using it for the key value.

[ mingo@elte.hu: small cleanups. ]

Signed-off-by: Ting Yang <tingy@cs.umass.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 721fe7744874..9f06094e5275 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1094,10 +1094,11 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
 static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
         struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
-        struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+        struct sched_entity *se = &p->se, *curr = cfs_rq_curr(cfs_rq);
 
         sched_info_queued(p);
 
+        update_curr(cfs_rq);
         update_stats_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
         /*
          * Child runs first: we let it run before the parent
@@ -1105,7 +1106,7 @@ static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
          * it will preempt the parent:
          */
         p->se.fair_key = current->se.fair_key -
-                niced_granularity(&rq->curr->se, sched_granularity(cfs_rq)) - 1;
+                niced_granularity(curr, sched_granularity(cfs_rq)) - 1;
         /*
          * The first wait is dominated by the child-runs-first logic,
          * so do not credit it with that waiting time yet: