[PATCH] uml: avoid malloc to sleep in atomic sections

Ugly trick to help make malloc not sleeping - we can't do anything else.  But
this is not yet optimal, since spinlock don't trigger in_atomic() when
preemption is disabled.

Also, even if ugly, this was already used in one place, and was even more
bogus.  Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

4 files changed, 19 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/arch/um/include/kern_util.h b/arch/um/include/kern_util.h
index 8f4e46d677ab..c649108a9e9f 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/kern_util.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/kern_util.h
@@ -120,8 +120,10 @@ extern void machine_halt(void);
 extern int is_syscall(unsigned long addr);
 extern void arch_switch(void);
 extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
-extern int um_in_interrupt(void);
 extern int cpu(void);
+
+/* Are we disallowed to sleep? Used to choose between GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC. */
+extern int __cant_sleep(void);
 extern void segv_handler(int sig, union uml_pt_regs *regs);
 extern void sigio_handler(int sig, union uml_pt_regs *regs);
 
diff --git a/arch/um/include/user.h b/arch/um/include/user.h
index 0f865ef46918..91b0ac4ad88c 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/user.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/user.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ extern int open_gdb_chan(void);
 extern unsigned long strlcpy(char *, const char *, unsigned long);
 extern unsigned long strlcat(char *, const char *, unsigned long);
 extern void *um_vmalloc(int size);
+extern void *um_vmalloc_atomic(int size);
 extern void vfree(void *ptr);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c b/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c
index e167cf0a71f4..3113cab8675e 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c
@@ -287,17 +287,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(disable_hlt);
 
 void *um_kmalloc(int size)
 {
-        return(kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL));
+        return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
 void *um_kmalloc_atomic(int size)
 {
-        return(kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC));
+        return kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
 
 void *um_vmalloc(int size)
 {
-        return(vmalloc(size));
+        return vmalloc(size);
+}
+
+void *um_vmalloc_atomic(int size)
+{
+        return __vmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_HIGHMEM, PAGE_KERNEL);
+}
+
+int __cant_sleep(void) {
+        return in_atomic() || irqs_disabled() || in_interrupt();
+        /* Is in_interrupt() really needed? */
 }
 
 unsigned long get_fault_addr(void)
@@ -369,11 +379,6 @@ int smp_sigio_handler(void)
         return(0);
 }
 
-int um_in_interrupt(void)
-{
-        return(in_interrupt());
-}
-
 int cpu(void)
 {
         return(current_thread->cpu);
diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c
index 36cc8475bcda..6490a4ff40ac 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int run_helper(void (*pre_exec)(void *), void *pre_data, char **argv,
 
         if((stack_out != NULL) && (*stack_out != 0))
                 stack = *stack_out;
-        else stack = alloc_stack(0, um_in_interrupt());
+        else stack = alloc_stack(0, __cant_sleep());
         if(stack == 0)
                 return(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int run_helper_thread(int (*proc)(void *), void *arg, unsigned int flags,
         unsigned long stack, sp;
         int pid, status, err;
 
-        stack = alloc_stack(stack_order, um_in_interrupt());
+        stack = alloc_stack(stack_order, __cant_sleep());
         if(stack == 0) return(-ENOMEM);
 
         sp = stack + (page_size() << stack_order) - sizeof(void *);