Fix misspellings of "agressive".

Fix the various misspellings of "agressive", as well as a couple
other things on the same lines while we're there.

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

4 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
index 7b39f4a35e98..7b08d6caaa99 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
          *  It shall be a tagged command.
          *  Read SIMPLE+TAG.
          *  The C code will deal with errors.
-         *  Agressive optimization, is'nt it? :)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :)
          */
         SCR_MOVE_ABS (2) ^ SCR_MSG_IN,
                 HADDR_1 (msgin),
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
                 RADDR_1 (dsa),
         /*
          *  The SIDL still contains the TAG value.
-         *  Agressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
          */
         SCR_REG_SFBR (sidl, SCR_SHL, 0),
                 0,
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
index 851f2706f220..6e5b952312e3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
          *  It shall be a tagged command.
          *  Read SIMPLE+TAG.
          *  The C code will deal with errors.
-         *  Agressive optimization, is'nt it? :)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :)
          */
         SCR_MOVE_ABS (2) ^ SCR_MSG_IN,
                 HADDR_1 (msgin),
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
                 offsetof(struct sym_lcb, head.itlq_tbl_sa),
         /*
          *  The SIDL still contains the TAG value.
-         *  Agressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
          */
         SCR_REG_SFBR (sidl, SCR_SHL, 0),
                 0,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index dc2724fa7622..7916b50f9a13 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_space_block(struct inode *inode)
 
         size = (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - sizeof(struct ext4_extent_header))
                         / sizeof(struct ext4_extent);
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
         if (size > 6)
                 size = 6;
 #endif
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_space_block_idx(struct inode *inode)
 
         size = (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - sizeof(struct ext4_extent_header))
                         / sizeof(struct ext4_extent_idx);
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
         if (size > 5)
                 size = 5;
 #endif
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_space_root(struct inode *inode)
         size = sizeof(EXT4_I(inode)->i_data);
         size -= sizeof(struct ext4_extent_header);
         size /= sizeof(struct ext4_extent);
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
         if (size > 3)
                 size = 3;
 #endif
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_space_root_idx(struct inode *inode)
         size = sizeof(EXT4_I(inode)->i_data);
         size -= sizeof(struct ext4_extent_header);
         size /= sizeof(struct ext4_extent_idx);
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
         if (size > 4)
                 size = 4;
 #endif
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ex1,
          */
         if (le16_to_cpu(ex1->ee_len) + le16_to_cpu(ex2->ee_len) > EXT_MAX_LEN)
                 return 0;
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
         if (le16_to_cpu(ex1->ee_len) >= 4)
                 return 0;
 #endif
@@ -1891,8 +1891,8 @@ void ext4_ext_init(struct super_block *sb)
 
         if (test_opt(sb, EXTENTS)) {
                 printk("EXT4-fs: file extents enabled");
-#ifdef AGRESSIVE_TEST
-                printk(", agressive tests");
+#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST
+                printk(", aggressive tests");
 #endif
 #ifdef CHECK_BINSEARCH
                 printk(", check binsearch");
diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h
index a41cc24568ca..7eb1d73fc5d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h
+++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h
@@ -22,12 +22,12 @@
 #include <linux/ext4_fs.h>
 
 /*
- * With AGRESSIVE_TEST defined, the capacity of index/leaf blocks
+ * With AGGRESSIVE_TEST defined, the capacity of index/leaf blocks
  * becomes very small, so index split, in-depth growing and
  * other hard changes happen much more often.
  * This is for debug purposes only.
  */
-#define AGRESSIVE_TEST_
+#define AGGRESSIVE_TEST_
 
 /*
  * With EXTENTS_STATS defined, the number of blocks and extents