this_cpu: xfs_icsb_modify_counters does not need "cpu" variable

The xfs_icsb_modify_counters() function no longer needs the cpu variable
if we use this_cpu_ptr() and we can get rid of get/put_cpu().

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 8b6c9e807efb..ccafe8ef7ad5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -2389,12 +2389,12 @@ xfs_icsb_modify_counters(
 {
         xfs_icsb_cnts_t *icsbp;
         long long       lcounter;       /* long counter for 64 bit fields */
-        int             cpu, ret = 0;
+        int             ret = 0;
 
         might_sleep();
 again:
-        cpu = get_cpu();
-        icsbp = (xfs_icsb_cnts_t *)per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_sb_cnts, cpu);
+        preempt_disable();
+        icsbp = this_cpu_ptr(mp->m_sb_cnts);
 
         /*
          * if the counter is disabled, go to slow path
@@ -2438,11 +2438,11 @@ again:
                 break;
         }
         xfs_icsb_unlock_cntr(icsbp);
-        put_cpu();
+        preempt_enable();
         return 0;
 
 slow_path:
-        put_cpu();
+        preempt_enable();
 
         /*
          * serialise with a mutex so we don't burn lots of cpu on
@@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ slow_path:
 
 balance_counter:
         xfs_icsb_unlock_cntr(icsbp);
-        put_cpu();
+        preempt_enable();
 
         /*
          * We may have multiple threads here if multiple per-cpu