Conflicts:
	Makefile
	arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
	arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
	kernel/sched.c
	kernel/time/tick-sched.c

Relevant API and functions changes (solved in this commit):
- (API) .enqueue_task() (enqueue_task_litmus),
  dequeue_task() (dequeue_task_litmus),
  [litmus/sched_litmus.c]
- (API) .select_task_rq() (select_task_rq_litmus)
  [litmus/sched_litmus.c]
- (API) sysrq_dump_trace_buffer() and sysrq_handle_kill_rt_tasks()
  [litmus/sched_trace.c]
- struct kfifo internal buffer name changed (buffer -> buf)
  [litmus/sched_trace.c]
- add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked -> __add_wait_queue_tail_exclusive
  [litmus/fmlp.c]
- syscall numbers for both x86_32 and x86_64

If you build aout support as a module, you'll want these exported.

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Tony Luck reports that the addition of the access_ok() check in commit
0eead9ab41da ("Don't dump task struct in a.out core-dumps") broke the
ia64 compile due to missing the necessary header file includes.

Rather than add yet another include (<asm/unistd.h>) to make everything
happy, just uninline the silly core dump helper functions and move the
bodies to fs/exec.c where they make a lot more sense.

dump_seek() in particular was too big to be an inline function anyway,
and none of them are in any way performance-critical.  And we really
don't need to mess up our include file headers more than they already
are.

Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

akiphie points out that a.out core-dumps have that odd task struct
dumping that was never used and was never really a good idea (it goes
back into the mists of history, probably the original core-dumping
code).  Just remove it.

Also do the access_ok() check on dump_write().  It probably doesn't
matter (since normal filesystems all seem to do it anyway), but he
points out that it's normally done by the VFS layer, so ...

[ I suspect that we should possibly do "vfs_write()" instead of
  calling ->write directly.  That also does the whole fsnotify and write
  statistics thing, which may or may not be a good idea. ]

And just to be anal, do this all for the x86-64 32-bit a.out emulation
code too, even though it's not enabled (and won't currently even
compile)

Reported-by: akiphie <akiphie@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

* 'for-2.6.36' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
  nfsd: fix BUG at fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h:199 on unlink

As of commit 43a9aa64a2f4330a9cb59aaf5c5636566bce067c "NFSD:
Fill in WCC data for REMOVE, RMDIR, MKNOD, and MKDIR", we sometimes call
fh_unlock on a filehandle that isn't fully initialized.

We should fix up the callers, but as a quick fix it is also sufficient
just to remove this assertion.

Reported-by: Marius Tolzmann <tolzmann@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This patch disables the fanotify syscalls by just not building them and
letting the cond_syscall() statements in kernel/sys_ni.c redirect them
to sys_ni_syscall().

It was pointed out by Tvrtko Ursulin that the fanotify interface did not
include an explicit prioritization between groups.  This is necessary
for fanotify to be usable for hierarchical storage management software,
as they must get first access to the file, before inotify-like notifiers
see the file.

This feature can be added in an ABI compatible way in the next release
(by using a number of bits in the flags field to carry the info) but it
was suggested by Alan that maybe we should just hold off and do it in
the next cycle, likely with an (new) explicit argument to the syscall.
I don't like this approach best as I know people are already starting to
use the current interface, but Alan is all wise and noone on list backed
me up with just using what we have.  I feel this is needlessly ripping
the rug out from under people at the last minute, but if others think it
needs to be a new argument it might be the best way forward.

Three choices:
Go with what we got (and implement the new feature next cycle).  Add a
new field right now (and implement the new feature next cycle).  Wait
till next cycle to release the ABI (and implement the new feature next
cycle).  This is number 3.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client:
  ceph: update issue_seq on cap grant
  ceph: send cap release message early on failed revoke.
  ceph: Update max_len with minimum required size
  ceph: Fix return value of encode_fh function
  ceph: avoid null deref in osd request error path
  ceph: fix list_add usage on unsafe_writes list

* 'for-linus' of git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd:
  exofs: Fix double page_unlock BUG in write_begin/end

This BUG is there since the first submit of the code, but only triggered
in last Kernel. It's timing related do to the asynchronous object-creation
behaviour of exofs. (Which should be investigated farther)

The bug is obvious hence the fixed.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <Boaz Harrosh bharrosh@panasas.com>