diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt | 61 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 396 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 17 |
6 files changed, 299 insertions, 196 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt index 7c1dfb19fc4..7f40c72a9c5 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | |||
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Bibtex Entries | |||
186 | 186 | ||
187 | @article{Kung80 | 187 | @article{Kung80 |
188 | ,author="H. T. Kung and Q. Lehman" | 188 | ,author="H. T. Kung and Q. Lehman" |
189 | ,title="Concurrent Maintenance of Binary Search Trees" | 189 | ,title="Concurrent Manipulation of Binary Search Trees" |
190 | ,Year="1980" | 190 | ,Year="1980" |
191 | ,Month="September" | 191 | ,Month="September" |
192 | ,journal="ACM Transactions on Database Systems" | 192 | ,journal="ACM Transactions on Database Systems" |
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt index cdb20d41a44..31ef8fe07f8 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | |||
@@ -271,15 +271,14 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! | |||
271 | The same cautions apply to call_rcu_bh() and call_rcu_sched(). | 271 | The same cautions apply to call_rcu_bh() and call_rcu_sched(). |
272 | 272 | ||
273 | 9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include | 273 | 9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include |
274 | rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), | 274 | rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), and |
275 | list_for_each_continue_rcu(), and list_for_each_safe_rcu(), | 275 | list_for_each_safe_rcu(), must be either within an RCU read-side |
276 | must be either within an RCU read-side critical section or | 276 | critical section or must be protected by appropriate update-side |
277 | must be protected by appropriate update-side locks. RCU | 277 | locks. RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by |
278 | read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() | 278 | rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), or by similar primitives |
279 | and rcu_read_unlock(), or by similar primitives such as | 279 | such as rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), in which |
280 | rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), in which case | 280 | case the matching rcu_dereference() primitive must be used in |
281 | the matching rcu_dereference() primitive must be used in order | 281 | order to keep lockdep happy, in this case, rcu_dereference_bh(). |
282 | to keep lockdep happy, in this case, rcu_dereference_bh(). | ||
283 | 282 | ||
284 | The reason that it is permissible to use RCU list-traversal | 283 | The reason that it is permissible to use RCU list-traversal |
285 | primitives when the update-side lock is held is that doing so | 284 | primitives when the update-side lock is held is that doing so |
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt index 4349c1487e9..adb5a378284 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | |||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows: | |||
205 | audit_copy_rule(&ne->rule, &e->rule); | 205 | audit_copy_rule(&ne->rule, &e->rule); |
206 | ne->rule.action = newaction; | 206 | ne->rule.action = newaction; |
207 | ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count; | 207 | ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count; |
208 | list_replace_rcu(e, ne); | 208 | list_replace_rcu(&e->list, &ne->list); |
209 | call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule); | 209 | call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule); |
210 | return 0; | 210 | return 0; |
211 | } | 211 | } |
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt index 4202ad09313..141d531aa14 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt | |||
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ release_referenced() delete() | |||
20 | { { | 20 | { { |
21 | ... write_lock(&list_lock); | 21 | ... write_lock(&list_lock); |
22 | atomic_dec(&el->rc, relfunc) ... | 22 | atomic_dec(&el->rc, relfunc) ... |
23 | ... delete_element | 23 | ... remove_element |
24 | } write_unlock(&list_lock); | 24 | } write_unlock(&list_lock); |
25 | ... | 25 | ... |
26 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) | 26 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) |
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ release_referenced() delete() | |||
52 | { { | 52 | { { |
53 | ... spin_lock(&list_lock); | 53 | ... spin_lock(&list_lock); |
54 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) ... | 54 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) ... |
55 | call_rcu(&el->head, el_free); delete_element | 55 | call_rcu(&el->head, el_free); remove_element |
56 | ... spin_unlock(&list_lock); | 56 | ... spin_unlock(&list_lock); |
57 | } ... | 57 | } ... |
58 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) | 58 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) |
@@ -64,3 +64,60 @@ Sometimes, a reference to the element needs to be obtained in the | |||
64 | update (write) stream. In such cases, atomic_inc_not_zero() might be | 64 | update (write) stream. In such cases, atomic_inc_not_zero() might be |
65 | overkill, since we hold the update-side spinlock. One might instead | 65 | overkill, since we hold the update-side spinlock. One might instead |
66 | use atomic_inc() in such cases. | 66 | use atomic_inc() in such cases. |
67 | |||
68 | It is not always convenient to deal with "FAIL" in the | ||
69 | search_and_reference() code path. In such cases, the | ||
70 | atomic_dec_and_test() may be moved from delete() to el_free() | ||
71 | as follows: | ||
72 | |||
73 | 1. 2. | ||
74 | add() search_and_reference() | ||
75 | { { | ||
76 | alloc_object rcu_read_lock(); | ||
77 | ... search_for_element | ||
78 | atomic_set(&el->rc, 1); atomic_inc(&el->rc); | ||
79 | spin_lock(&list_lock); ... | ||
80 | |||
81 | add_element rcu_read_unlock(); | ||
82 | ... } | ||
83 | spin_unlock(&list_lock); 4. | ||
84 | } delete() | ||
85 | 3. { | ||
86 | release_referenced() spin_lock(&list_lock); | ||
87 | { ... | ||
88 | ... remove_element | ||
89 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) spin_unlock(&list_lock); | ||
90 | kfree(el); ... | ||
91 | ... call_rcu(&el->head, el_free); | ||
92 | } ... | ||
93 | 5. } | ||
94 | void el_free(struct rcu_head *rhp) | ||
95 | { | ||
96 | release_referenced(); | ||
97 | } | ||
98 | |||
99 | The key point is that the initial reference added by add() is not removed | ||
100 | until after a grace period has elapsed following removal. This means that | ||
101 | search_and_reference() cannot find this element, which means that the value | ||
102 | of el->rc cannot increase. Thus, once it reaches zero, there are no | ||
103 | readers that can or ever will be able to reference the element. The | ||
104 | element can therefore safely be freed. This in turn guarantees that if | ||
105 | any reader finds the element, that reader may safely acquire a reference | ||
106 | without checking the value of the reference counter. | ||
107 | |||
108 | In cases where delete() can sleep, synchronize_rcu() can be called from | ||
109 | delete(), so that el_free() can be subsumed into delete as follows: | ||
110 | |||
111 | 4. | ||
112 | delete() | ||
113 | { | ||
114 | spin_lock(&list_lock); | ||
115 | ... | ||
116 | remove_element | ||
117 | spin_unlock(&list_lock); | ||
118 | ... | ||
119 | synchronize_rcu(); | ||
120 | if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) | ||
121 | kfree(el); | ||
122 | ... | ||
123 | } | ||
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt index 672d1908325..c776968f446 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | |||
@@ -10,51 +10,63 @@ for rcutree and next for rcutiny. | |||
10 | 10 | ||
11 | CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 11 | CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats |
12 | 12 | ||
13 | These implementations of RCU provides several debugfs files under the | 13 | These implementations of RCU provide several debugfs directories under the |
14 | top-level directory "rcu": | 14 | top-level directory "rcu": |
15 | 15 | ||
16 | rcu/rcudata: | 16 | rcu/rcu_bh |
17 | rcu/rcu_preempt | ||
18 | rcu/rcu_sched | ||
19 | |||
20 | Each directory contains files for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | ||
21 | Note that rcu/rcu_preempt is only present for CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU. | ||
22 | For CONFIG_TREE_RCU, the RCU flavor maps onto the RCU-sched flavor, | ||
23 | so that activity for both appears in rcu/rcu_sched. | ||
24 | |||
25 | In addition, the following file appears in the top-level directory: | ||
26 | rcu/rcutorture. This file displays rcutorture test progress. The output | ||
27 | of "cat rcu/rcutorture" looks as follows: | ||
28 | |||
29 | rcutorture test sequence: 0 (test in progress) | ||
30 | rcutorture update version number: 615 | ||
31 | |||
32 | The first line shows the number of rcutorture tests that have completed | ||
33 | since boot. If a test is currently running, the "(test in progress)" | ||
34 | string will appear as shown above. The second line shows the number of | ||
35 | update cycles that the current test has started, or zero if there is | ||
36 | no test in progress. | ||
37 | |||
38 | |||
39 | Within each flavor directory (rcu/rcu_bh, rcu/rcu_sched, and possibly | ||
40 | also rcu/rcu_preempt) the following files will be present: | ||
41 | |||
42 | rcudata: | ||
17 | Displays fields in struct rcu_data. | 43 | Displays fields in struct rcu_data. |
18 | rcu/rcudata.csv: | 44 | rcuexp: |
19 | Comma-separated values spreadsheet version of rcudata. | 45 | Displays statistics for expedited grace periods. |
20 | rcu/rcugp: | 46 | rcugp: |
21 | Displays grace-period counters. | 47 | Displays grace-period counters. |
22 | rcu/rcuhier: | 48 | rcuhier: |
23 | Displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy. | 49 | Displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy. |
24 | rcu/rcu_pending: | 50 | rcu_pending: |
25 | Displays counts of the reasons rcu_pending() decided that RCU had | 51 | Displays counts of the reasons rcu_pending() decided that RCU had |
26 | work to do. | 52 | work to do. |
27 | rcu/rcutorture: | 53 | rcuboost: |
28 | Displays rcutorture test progress. | ||
29 | rcu/rcuboost: | ||
30 | Displays RCU boosting statistics. Only present if | 54 | Displays RCU boosting statistics. Only present if |
31 | CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y. | 55 | CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y. |
32 | 56 | ||
33 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | 57 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcudata" looks as follows: |
34 | 58 | ||
35 | rcu_sched: | 59 | 0!c=30455 g=30456 pq=1 qp=1 dt=126535/140000000000000/0 df=2002 of=4 ql=0/0 qs=N... b=10 ci=74572 nci=0 co=1131 ca=716 |
36 | 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0 | 60 | 1!c=30719 g=30720 pq=1 qp=0 dt=132007/140000000000000/0 df=1874 of=10 ql=0/0 qs=N... b=10 ci=123209 nci=0 co=685 ca=982 |
37 | 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0 | 61 | 2!c=30150 g=30151 pq=1 qp=1 dt=138537/140000000000000/0 df=1707 of=8 ql=0/0 qs=N... b=10 ci=80132 nci=0 co=1328 ca=1458 |
38 | 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0 | 62 | 3 c=31249 g=31250 pq=1 qp=0 dt=107255/140000000000000/0 df=1749 of=6 ql=0/450 qs=NRW. b=10 ci=151700 nci=0 co=509 ca=622 |
39 | 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pgp=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0 | 63 | 4!c=29502 g=29503 pq=1 qp=1 dt=83647/140000000000000/0 df=965 of=5 ql=0/0 qs=N... b=10 ci=65643 nci=0 co=1373 ca=1521 |
40 | 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0 | 64 | 5 c=31201 g=31202 pq=1 qp=1 dt=70422/0/0 df=535 of=7 ql=0/0 qs=.... b=10 ci=58500 nci=0 co=764 ca=698 |
41 | 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0 | 65 | 6!c=30253 g=30254 pq=1 qp=1 dt=95363/140000000000000/0 df=780 of=5 ql=0/0 qs=N... b=10 ci=100607 nci=0 co=1414 ca=1353 |
42 | 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0 | 66 | 7 c=31178 g=31178 pq=1 qp=0 dt=91536/0/0 df=547 of=4 ql=0/0 qs=.... b=10 ci=109819 nci=0 co=1115 ca=969 |
43 | 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pgp=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0 | 67 | |
44 | rcu_bh: | 68 | This file has one line per CPU, or eight for this 8-CPU system. |
45 | 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 69 | The fields are as follows: |
46 | 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0 | ||
47 | 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
48 | 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
49 | 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
50 | 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
51 | 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
52 | 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pgp=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | ||
53 | |||
54 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second | ||
55 | for rcu_bh. Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an | ||
56 | additional section for rcu_preempt. Each section has one line per CPU, | ||
57 | or eight for this 8-CPU system. The fields are as follows: | ||
58 | 70 | ||
59 | o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | 71 | o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. |
60 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | 72 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, |
@@ -64,11 +76,13 @@ o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | |||
64 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | 76 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. |
65 | 77 | ||
66 | o "c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 78 | o "c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have |
67 | completed. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode may | 79 | completed. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag |
68 | lag quite a ways behind, for example, CPU 6 under "rcu_sched" | 80 | quite a ways behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, |
69 | above, which has been offline through not quite 40,000 RCU grace | 81 | which has been offline through 16 RCU grace periods. It is not |
70 | periods. It is not unusual to see CPUs lagging by thousands of | 82 | unusual to see offline CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. |
71 | grace periods. | 83 | Note that although the grace-period number is an unsigned long, |
84 | it is printed out as a signed long to allow more human-friendly | ||
85 | representation near boot time. | ||
72 | 86 | ||
73 | o "g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 87 | o "g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have |
74 | started. Again, offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode | 88 | started. Again, offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode |
@@ -84,30 +98,25 @@ o "pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | |||
84 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | 98 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not |
85 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | 99 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. |
86 | 100 | ||
87 | o "pgp" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | ||
88 | state for this CPU corresponds to. This is important for handling | ||
89 | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | ||
90 | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | ||
91 | reporting its own quiescent state. If CPU 1 was the last CPU | ||
92 | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | ||
93 | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | ||
94 | the next grace period! | ||
95 | |||
96 | o "qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | 101 | o "qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from |
97 | this CPU. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dyntick idle mode might | 102 | this CPU. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dyntick idle mode might |
98 | well have qp=1, which is OK: RCU is still ignoring them. | 103 | well have qp=1, which is OK: RCU is still ignoring them. |
99 | 104 | ||
100 | o "dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 105 | o "dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented |
101 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | 106 | when entering or leaving idle, either due to a context switch or |
102 | scheduler or by irq. This number is even if the CPU is in | 107 | due to an interrupt. This number is even if the CPU is in idle |
103 | dyntick idle mode and odd otherwise. The number after the first | 108 | from RCU's viewpoint and odd otherwise. The number after the |
104 | "/" is the interrupt nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, | 109 | first "/" is the interrupt nesting depth when in idle state, |
105 | or one greater than the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | 110 | or a large number added to the interrupt-nesting depth when |
106 | The number after the second "/" is the NMI nesting depth. | 111 | running a non-idle task. Some architectures do not accurately |
112 | count interrupt nesting when running in non-idle kernel context, | ||
113 | which can result in interesting anomalies such as negative | ||
114 | interrupt-nesting levels. The number after the second "/" | ||
115 | is the NMI nesting depth. | ||
107 | 116 | ||
108 | o "df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 117 | o "df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a |
109 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | 118 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in |
110 | dynticks-idle state. | 119 | idle state. |
111 | 120 | ||
112 | o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 121 | o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a |
113 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | 122 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being |
@@ -120,9 +129,13 @@ o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | |||
120 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | 129 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. |
121 | 130 | ||
122 | o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | 131 | o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on |
123 | this CPU. This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | 132 | this CPU. The first number is the number of "lazy" callbacks |
124 | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | 133 | that are known to RCU to only be freeing memory, and the number |
125 | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | 134 | after the "/" is the total number of callbacks, lazy or not. |
135 | These counters count callbacks regardless of what phase of | ||
136 | grace-period processing that they are in (new, waiting for | ||
137 | grace period to start, waiting for grace period to end, ready | ||
138 | to invoke). | ||
126 | 139 | ||
127 | o "qs" gives an indication of the state of the callback queue | 140 | o "qs" gives an indication of the state of the callback queue |
128 | with four characters: | 141 | with four characters: |
@@ -150,6 +163,43 @@ o "qs" gives an indication of the state of the callback queue | |||
150 | If there are no callbacks in a given one of the above states, | 163 | If there are no callbacks in a given one of the above states, |
151 | the corresponding character is replaced by ".". | 164 | the corresponding character is replaced by ".". |
152 | 165 | ||
166 | o "b" is the batch limit for this CPU. If more than this number | ||
167 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | ||
168 | be deferred. | ||
169 | |||
170 | o "ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for | ||
171 | this CPU. Note that ci+nci+ql is the number of callbacks that have | ||
172 | been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity. | ||
173 | |||
174 | o "nci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been offloaded from | ||
175 | this CPU. This will always be zero unless the kernel was built | ||
176 | with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y and the "rcu_nocbs=" kernel boot | ||
177 | parameter was specified. | ||
178 | |||
179 | o "co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to | ||
180 | this CPU going offline. These orphaned callbacks have been moved | ||
181 | to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU. | ||
182 | |||
183 | o "ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted by this | ||
184 | CPU due to other CPUs going offline. Note that ci+co-ca+ql is | ||
185 | the number of RCU callbacks registered on this CPU. | ||
186 | |||
187 | |||
188 | Kernels compiled with CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y display the following from | ||
189 | /debug/rcu/rcu_preempt/rcudata: | ||
190 | |||
191 | 0!c=12865 g=12866 pq=1 qp=1 dt=83113/140000000000000/0 df=288 of=11 ql=0/0 qs=N... kt=0/O ktl=944 b=10 ci=60709 nci=0 co=748 ca=871 | ||
192 | 1 c=14407 g=14408 pq=1 qp=0 dt=100679/140000000000000/0 df=378 of=7 ql=0/119 qs=NRW. kt=0/W ktl=9b6 b=10 ci=109740 nci=0 co=589 ca=485 | ||
193 | 2 c=14407 g=14408 pq=1 qp=0 dt=105486/0/0 df=90 of=9 ql=0/89 qs=NRW. kt=0/W ktl=c0c b=10 ci=83113 nci=0 co=533 ca=490 | ||
194 | 3 c=14407 g=14408 pq=1 qp=0 dt=107138/0/0 df=142 of=8 ql=0/188 qs=NRW. kt=0/W ktl=b96 b=10 ci=121114 nci=0 co=426 ca=290 | ||
195 | 4 c=14405 g=14406 pq=1 qp=1 dt=50238/0/0 df=706 of=7 ql=0/0 qs=.... kt=0/W ktl=812 b=10 ci=34929 nci=0 co=643 ca=114 | ||
196 | 5!c=14168 g=14169 pq=1 qp=0 dt=45465/140000000000000/0 df=161 of=11 ql=0/0 qs=N... kt=0/O ktl=b4d b=10 ci=47712 nci=0 co=677 ca=722 | ||
197 | 6 c=14404 g=14405 pq=1 qp=0 dt=59454/0/0 df=94 of=6 ql=0/0 qs=.... kt=0/W ktl=e57 b=10 ci=55597 nci=0 co=701 ca=811 | ||
198 | 7 c=14407 g=14408 pq=1 qp=1 dt=68850/0/0 df=31 of=8 ql=0/0 qs=.... kt=0/W ktl=14bd b=10 ci=77475 nci=0 co=508 ca=1042 | ||
199 | |||
200 | This is similar to the output discussed above, but contains the following | ||
201 | additional fields: | ||
202 | |||
153 | o "kt" is the per-CPU kernel-thread state. The digit preceding | 203 | o "kt" is the per-CPU kernel-thread state. The digit preceding |
154 | the first slash is zero if there is no work pending and 1 | 204 | the first slash is zero if there is no work pending and 1 |
155 | otherwise. The character between the first pair of slashes is | 205 | otherwise. The character between the first pair of slashes is |
@@ -184,35 +234,51 @@ o "ktl" is the low-order 16 bits (in hexadecimal) of the count of | |||
184 | 234 | ||
185 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernels. | 235 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernels. |
186 | 236 | ||
187 | o "b" is the batch limit for this CPU. If more than this number | ||
188 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | ||
189 | be deferred. | ||
190 | 237 | ||
191 | o "ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for | 238 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcuexp" looks as follows: |
192 | this CPU. Note that ci+ql is the number of callbacks that have | ||
193 | been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity. | ||
194 | 239 | ||
195 | o "co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to | 240 | s=21872 d=21872 w=0 tf=0 wd1=0 wd2=0 n=0 sc=21872 dt=21872 dl=0 dx=21872 |
196 | this CPU going offline. These orphaned callbacks have been moved | 241 | |
197 | to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU. | 242 | These fields are as follows: |
243 | |||
244 | o "s" is the starting sequence number. | ||
198 | 245 | ||
199 | o "ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to | 246 | o "d" is the ending sequence number. When the starting and ending |
200 | other CPUs going offline. Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of | 247 | numbers differ, there is an expedited grace period in progress. |
201 | RCU callbacks registered on this CPU. | ||
202 | 248 | ||
203 | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in | 249 | o "w" is the number of times that the sequence numbers have been |
204 | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. | 250 | in danger of wrapping. |
205 | 251 | ||
252 | o "tf" is the number of times that contention has resulted in a | ||
253 | failure to begin an expedited grace period. | ||
206 | 254 | ||
207 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | 255 | o "wd1" and "wd2" are the number of times that an attempt to |
256 | start an expedited grace period found that someone else had | ||
257 | completed an expedited grace period that satisfies the | ||
258 | attempted request. "Our work is done." | ||
208 | 259 | ||
209 | rcu_sched: completed=33062 gpnum=33063 | 260 | o "n" is number of times that contention was so great that |
210 | rcu_bh: completed=464 gpnum=464 | 261 | the request was demoted from an expedited grace period to |
262 | a normal grace period. | ||
263 | |||
264 | o "sc" is the number of times that the attempt to start a | ||
265 | new expedited grace period succeeded. | ||
266 | |||
267 | o "dt" is the number of times that we attempted to update | ||
268 | the "d" counter. | ||
269 | |||
270 | o "dl" is the number of times that we failed to update the "d" | ||
271 | counter. | ||
272 | |||
273 | o "dx" is the number of times that we succeeded in updating | ||
274 | the "d" counter. | ||
211 | 275 | ||
212 | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh". Note that | 276 | |
213 | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional | 277 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcugp" looks as follows: |
214 | "rcu_preempt" line. The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, | 278 | |
215 | and are as follows: | 279 | completed=31249 gpnum=31250 age=1 max=18 |
280 | |||
281 | These fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, and are as follows: | ||
216 | 282 | ||
217 | o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 283 | o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. |
218 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | 284 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a |
@@ -220,44 +286,42 @@ o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | |||
220 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | 286 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. |
221 | 287 | ||
222 | o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is | 288 | o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is |
223 | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | 289 | similarly comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that |
224 | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | 290 | a CPU whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that |
225 | corresponding RCU grace period has started. | 291 | the corresponding RCU grace period has started. |
292 | |||
293 | If these two fields are equal, then there is no grace period | ||
294 | in progress, in other words, RCU is idle. On the other hand, | ||
295 | if the two fields differ (as they are above), then an RCU grace | ||
296 | period is in progress. | ||
226 | 297 | ||
227 | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | 298 | o "age" is the number of jiffies that the current grace period |
228 | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | 299 | has extended for, or zero if there is no grace period currently |
229 | is idle. On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | 300 | in effect. |
230 | do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | ||
231 | 301 | ||
302 | o "max" is the age in jiffies of the longest-duration grace period | ||
303 | thus far. | ||
232 | 304 | ||
233 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | 305 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcuhier" looks as follows: |
234 | 306 | ||
235 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 | 307 | c=14407 g=14408 s=0 jfq=2 j=c863 nfqs=12040/nfqsng=0(12040) fqlh=1051 oqlen=0/0 |
236 | 1/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0 | 308 | 3/3 ..>. 0:7 ^0 |
237 | 3/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3 | 309 | e/e ..>. 0:3 ^0 d/d ..>. 4:7 ^1 |
238 | 3/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0 2/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3 | ||
239 | rcu_bh: | ||
240 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 | ||
241 | 0/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0 | ||
242 | 0/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3 | ||
243 | 0/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0 0/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3 | ||
244 | 310 | ||
245 | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, | 311 | The fields are as follows: |
246 | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional | ||
247 | "rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows: | ||
248 | 312 | ||
249 | o "c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | 313 | o "c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcu_preempt/rcugp. |
250 | 314 | ||
251 | o "g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | 315 | o "g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcu_preempt/rcugp. |
252 | 316 | ||
253 | o "s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | 317 | o "s" is the current state of the force_quiescent_state() |
254 | state machine. | 318 | state machine. |
255 | 319 | ||
256 | o "jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | 320 | o "jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period |
257 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | 321 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things |
258 | along. Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode throughout the grace | 322 | along. Note that CPUs in idle mode throughout the grace period |
259 | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | 323 | will not report on their own, but rather must be check by some |
260 | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | 324 | other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). |
261 | 325 | ||
262 | o "j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | 326 | o "j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. |
263 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | 327 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to |
@@ -268,7 +332,8 @@ o "nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | |||
268 | 332 | ||
269 | o "nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | 333 | o "nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), |
270 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active. This can | 334 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active. This can |
271 | happen due to races. The number in parentheses is the difference | 335 | no longer happen due to grace-period processing being pushed |
336 | into a kthread. The number in parentheses is the difference | ||
272 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | 337 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that |
273 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | 338 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. |
274 | 339 | ||
@@ -276,28 +341,27 @@ o "fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | |||
276 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | 341 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) |
277 | due to contention on ->fqslock. | 342 | due to contention on ->fqslock. |
278 | 343 | ||
279 | o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | 344 | o Each element of the form "3/3 ..>. 0:7 ^0" represents one rcu_node |
280 | rcu_node. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | 345 | structure. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, |
281 | root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | 346 | from root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data |
282 | as forming yet another level after the leaves. Note that there | 347 | structures as forming yet another level after the leaves. |
283 | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | 348 | Note that there might be either one, two, three, or even four |
284 | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | 349 | levels of rcu_node structures, depending on the relationship |
285 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | 350 | between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF (possibly |
351 | adjusted using the rcu_fanout_leaf kernel boot parameter), and | ||
352 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS (possibly adjusted using the nr_cpu_ids count of | ||
353 | possible CPUs for the booting hardware). | ||
286 | 354 | ||
287 | o The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | 355 | o The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed |
288 | by the qsmaskinit. The qsmask will have one bit | 356 | by the qsmaskinit. The qsmask will have one bit |
289 | set for each entity in the next lower level that | 357 | set for each entity in the next lower level that has |
290 | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | 358 | not yet checked in for the current grace period ("e" |
359 | indicating CPUs 5, 6, and 7 in the example above). | ||
291 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | 360 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is |
292 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. | 361 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. |
293 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | 362 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask |
294 | at the beginning of each grace period. | 363 | at the beginning of each grace period. |
295 | 364 | ||
296 | For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first | ||
297 | entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we | ||
298 | are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the | ||
299 | current grace period. | ||
300 | |||
301 | o The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state | 365 | o The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state |
302 | of the blocked-tasks lists. A "G" preceding the ">" | 366 | of the blocked-tasks lists. A "G" preceding the ">" |
303 | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU | 367 | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU |
@@ -312,48 +376,39 @@ o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | |||
312 | A "." character appears if the corresponding condition | 376 | A "." character appears if the corresponding condition |
313 | does not hold, so that "..>." indicates that no tasks | 377 | does not hold, so that "..>." indicates that no tasks |
314 | are blocked. In contrast, "GE>T" indicates maximal | 378 | are blocked. In contrast, "GE>T" indicates maximal |
315 | inconvenience from blocked tasks. | 379 | inconvenience from blocked tasks. CONFIG_TREE_RCU |
380 | builds of the kernel will always show "..>.". | ||
316 | 381 | ||
317 | o The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | 382 | o The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs |
318 | served by this struct rcu_node. This can be helpful | 383 | served by this struct rcu_node. This can be helpful |
319 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | 384 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. |
320 | 385 | ||
321 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 386 | For example, the example rcu_node structure shown above |
322 | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | 387 | has "0:7", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 7. |
323 | 388 | ||
324 | o The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | 389 | o The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the |
325 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this | 390 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this rcu_node |
326 | rcu_node structure corresponds to. | 391 | structure corresponds to. For example, the "d/d ..>. 4:7 |
327 | 392 | ^1" has a "1" in this position, indicating that it | |
328 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 393 | corresponds to the "1" bit in the "3" shown in the |
329 | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | 394 | "3/3 ..>. 0:7 ^0" entry on the next level up. |
330 | the first entry at the middle level. | 395 | |
331 | 396 | ||
332 | 397 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_sched/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | |
333 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | 398 | |
334 | 399 | 0!np=26111 qsp=29 rpq=5386 cbr=1 cng=570 gpc=3674 gps=577 nn=15903 | |
335 | rcu_sched: | 400 | 1!np=28913 qsp=35 rpq=6097 cbr=1 cng=448 gpc=3700 gps=554 nn=18113 |
336 | 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nn=146741 | 401 | 2!np=32740 qsp=37 rpq=6202 cbr=0 cng=476 gpc=4627 gps=546 nn=20889 |
337 | 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nn=155792 | 402 | 3 np=23679 qsp=22 rpq=5044 cbr=1 cng=415 gpc=3403 gps=347 nn=14469 |
338 | 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nn=136629 | 403 | 4!np=30714 qsp=4 rpq=5574 cbr=0 cng=528 gpc=3931 gps=639 nn=20042 |
339 | 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nn=137723 | 404 | 5 np=28910 qsp=2 rpq=5246 cbr=0 cng=428 gpc=4105 gps=709 nn=18422 |
340 | 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nn=123110 | 405 | 6!np=38648 qsp=5 rpq=7076 cbr=0 cng=840 gpc=4072 gps=961 nn=25699 |
341 | 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nn=137456 | 406 | 7 np=37275 qsp=2 rpq=6873 cbr=0 cng=868 gpc=3416 gps=971 nn=25147 |
342 | 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nn=120834 | 407 | |
343 | 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nn=144888 | 408 | The fields are as follows: |
344 | rcu_bh: | 409 | |
345 | 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nn=145314 | 410 | o The leading number is the CPU number, with "!" indicating |
346 | 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nn=143180 | 411 | an offline CPU. |
347 | 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nn=117936 | ||
348 | 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nn=134863 | ||
349 | 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nn=110671 | ||
350 | 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nn=133235 | ||
351 | 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nn=110921 | ||
352 | 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nn=118542 | ||
353 | |||
354 | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" | ||
355 | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional | ||
356 | "rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows: | ||
357 | 412 | ||
358 | o "np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked | 413 | o "np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked |
359 | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | 414 | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. |
@@ -377,38 +432,23 @@ o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had | |||
377 | o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, | 432 | o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, |
378 | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 433 | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. |
379 | 434 | ||
380 | o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing. Alert | 435 | o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing. |
381 | readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very | ||
382 | closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU. This | ||
383 | is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). | ||
384 | |||
385 | |||
386 | The output of "cat rcu/rcutorture" looks as follows: | ||
387 | |||
388 | rcutorture test sequence: 0 (test in progress) | ||
389 | rcutorture update version number: 615 | ||
390 | |||
391 | The first line shows the number of rcutorture tests that have completed | ||
392 | since boot. If a test is currently running, the "(test in progress)" | ||
393 | string will appear as shown above. The second line shows the number of | ||
394 | update cycles that the current test has started, or zero if there is | ||
395 | no test in progress. | ||
396 | 436 | ||
397 | 437 | ||
398 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuboost" looks as follows: | 438 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuboost" looks as follows: |
399 | 439 | ||
400 | 0:5 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f | 440 | 0:3 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=c864 bt=c894 |
401 | balk: nt=0 egt=989 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=16 | 441 | balk: nt=0 egt=4695 bt=0 nb=0 ny=56 nos=0 |
402 | 6:7 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f | 442 | 4:7 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=c864 bt=c894 |
403 | balk: nt=0 egt=225 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=6 | 443 | balk: nt=0 egt=6541 bt=0 nb=0 ny=126 nos=0 |
404 | 444 | ||
405 | This information is output only for rcu_preempt. Each two-line entry | 445 | This information is output only for rcu_preempt. Each two-line entry |
406 | corresponds to a leaf rcu_node strcuture. The fields are as follows: | 446 | corresponds to a leaf rcu_node strcuture. The fields are as follows: |
407 | 447 | ||
408 | o "n:m" is the CPU-number range for the corresponding two-line | 448 | o "n:m" is the CPU-number range for the corresponding two-line |
409 | entry. In the sample output above, the first entry covers | 449 | entry. In the sample output above, the first entry covers |
410 | CPUs zero through five and the second entry covers CPUs 6 | 450 | CPUs zero through three and the second entry covers CPUs four |
411 | and 7. | 451 | through seven. |
412 | 452 | ||
413 | o "tasks=TNEB" gives the state of the various segments of the | 453 | o "tasks=TNEB" gives the state of the various segments of the |
414 | rnp->blocked_tasks list: | 454 | rnp->blocked_tasks list: |
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt index bf0f6de2aa0..0cc7820967f 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | |||
@@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ The foo_reclaim() function might appear as follows: | |||
499 | { | 499 | { |
500 | struct foo *fp = container_of(rp, struct foo, rcu); | 500 | struct foo *fp = container_of(rp, struct foo, rcu); |
501 | 501 | ||
502 | foo_cleanup(fp->a); | ||
503 | |||
502 | kfree(fp); | 504 | kfree(fp); |
503 | } | 505 | } |
504 | 506 | ||
@@ -521,6 +523,12 @@ o Use call_rcu() -after- removing a data element from an | |||
521 | read-side critical sections that might be referencing that | 523 | read-side critical sections that might be referencing that |
522 | data item. | 524 | data item. |
523 | 525 | ||
526 | If the callback for call_rcu() is not doing anything more than calling | ||
527 | kfree() on the structure, you can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() | ||
528 | to avoid having to write your own callback: | ||
529 | |||
530 | kfree_rcu(old_fp, rcu); | ||
531 | |||
524 | Again, see checklist.txt for additional rules governing the use of RCU. | 532 | Again, see checklist.txt for additional rules governing the use of RCU. |
525 | 533 | ||
526 | 534 | ||
@@ -773,8 +781,8 @@ a single atomic update, converting to RCU will require special care. | |||
773 | 781 | ||
774 | Also, the presence of synchronize_rcu() means that the RCU version of | 782 | Also, the presence of synchronize_rcu() means that the RCU version of |
775 | delete() can now block. If this is a problem, there is a callback-based | 783 | delete() can now block. If this is a problem, there is a callback-based |
776 | mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu(), that can be used in | 784 | mechanism that never blocks, namely call_rcu() or kfree_rcu(), that can |
777 | place of synchronize_rcu(). | 785 | be used in place of synchronize_rcu(). |
778 | 786 | ||
779 | 787 | ||
780 | 7. FULL LIST OF RCU APIs | 788 | 7. FULL LIST OF RCU APIs |
@@ -789,9 +797,7 @@ RCU list traversal: | |||
789 | list_for_each_entry_rcu | 797 | list_for_each_entry_rcu |
790 | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu | 798 | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu |
791 | hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu | 799 | hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu |
792 | 800 | list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu | |
793 | list_for_each_continue_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of new | ||
794 | list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu) | ||
795 | 801 | ||
796 | RCU pointer/list update: | 802 | RCU pointer/list update: |
797 | 803 | ||
@@ -813,6 +819,7 @@ RCU: Critical sections Grace period Barrier | |||
813 | rcu_read_unlock synchronize_rcu | 819 | rcu_read_unlock synchronize_rcu |
814 | rcu_dereference synchronize_rcu_expedited | 820 | rcu_dereference synchronize_rcu_expedited |
815 | call_rcu | 821 | call_rcu |
822 | kfree_rcu | ||
816 | 823 | ||
817 | 824 | ||
818 | bh: Critical sections Grace period Barrier | 825 | bh: Critical sections Grace period Barrier |