aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* acpi: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap2008-07-16
| | | | | | | | | | Fix printk format warning: linux-next-20080617/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:1258: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
* ACPI: fix processor throttling set errorYi Yang2008-07-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 When echo some invalid values to /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling, there isn't any error info returned, on the contray, it sets throttling value to some T* successfully, obviously, this is incorrect, a correct way should be to let it fail and return error info. This patch fixed the aforementioned issue, it also enables /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling to accept such values as 't0' and 'T0', it also strictly limits /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling only to accept "*", "t*" and "T*", "*" is the throttling state value the processor can support, current, it is 0 - 7. Before applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "1xxxxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# cd / [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T100" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "2xxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T2 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% *T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "7777" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# echo "7xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# After applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# vi drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "7000" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo $? 0 [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo t0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo Tt0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
* ACPI: change processors from array to per_cpu variableMike Travis2008-07-16
| | | | | | | | | Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
* acpi: use non-racy method for proc entries creationDenis V. Lunev2008-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data be setup before gluing PDE to main tree. Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race. Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* generic: use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr functionMike Travis2008-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr() function added by previous patch, which instead of passing the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask_t arg by value, pass it by pointer: -int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask) +int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask) * Modify CPU_MASK_ALL Depends on: [sched-devel]: sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* ACPI: throttling: fix build warningLen Brown2008-02-02
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Update the t-state for every affected cpu when t-state is changedZhao Yakui2008-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed. According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined. SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL. SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function for all affected cpus. SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in the domain. HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition on all the processors in the domain. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI : Add T-state event notifier functionZhao Yakui2008-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for the all affected cpus before updating T-state. So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added. Before updating T-state it can be called for all the affected cpus to get the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and _TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI : Update T-state coordination after getting _TSD infoZhao Yakui2008-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up the T-state coordination between CPUs. Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed independently. Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI : Check parameter when calling acpi_processor_get/set_throttlingZhao Yakui2008-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | It is necessary to check the parameter when calling the function of acpi_processor_get/set_throttling function so as to avoid the NULL pointer reference in pr or throttling. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: processor: Fix null pointer dereference in throttlingAlexey Starikovskiy2008-01-15
| | | | | | | http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Delete the IRQ operation in throttling controll via PTCZhao Yakui2007-12-01
| | | | | | | | | | | The IRQ operation(enable/disable) should be avoided when throttling is controlled via PTC method. It is replaced by the migration of task. This fixes an oops on T61 -- a regression due to f79f06ab9f86 b/c FixedHW support tried to read remote MSR with interrupts disabled. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Enable MSR (FixedHW) support for T-StatesZhao Yakui2007-11-16
| | | | | | | | | Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses the FixHW Control Status registers. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Use _TSS for throttling control, when present. Add error checks.Zhao Yakui2007-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _TSS was erroneously ignored, in favor of the FADT. When TSS is used, the access width is included in the PTC control/status register. So it is unnecessary that the access bit width is multiplied by 8. At the same time the bit_offset should be considered for system I/O Access. It should be checked the bit_width and bit_offset of PTC regsiter in order to avoid the failure of system I/O access. It means that bit_width plus bit_offset can't be greater than 32. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: throttle: Change internal APIs better handle _PTCZhao Yakui2007-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC. The following functions are concerned: acpi_read_throttling_status() acpi_write_throttling_state() acpi_get_throttling_value() acpi_get_throttling_state() Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: If _TSS exists, do not access FADT.duty_widthZhao Yakui2007-11-16
| | | | | | | | | Factor out legacy FADT.duty_width code and run it only in the non _TSS case. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Enforce T-state limit changes immediatelyZhao Yakui2007-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | When a T-state limit change notification is received, Linux must evaluate _TPC and change its current T-state immediately to comply with the new limit. Previously, Linux would notice the new limit only upon the next throttling change. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: quiet ACPI Exceptions due to no _PTC or _TSSLen Brown2007-07-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126] These methods are optional, so Linux should not alarm users when they are not found. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8802 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Acked-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
* ACPI: fix oops due to typo in new throttling codeLuming Yu2007-07-23
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: staticAdrian Bunk2007-07-03
| | | | | | | | make 2 needlessly global functions static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Lindent processor throttling codeLen Brown2007-06-02
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: add ACPI 3.0 _TPC _TSS _PTC throttling supportLuming Yu2007-06-02
| | | | | | | adds _TPC _TSS _PTC -- Throttling Present Capabilities Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: delete extra #defines in /drivers/acpi/ driversLen Brown2007-02-12
| | | | | | | | | Cosmetic only. Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME were invoked 0 or 1 times. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() useLen Brown2007-02-12
| | | | | | | | | | cosmetic only Make "module name" actually match the file name. Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care. Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPICA: use new ACPI headers.Alexey Starikovskiy2007-02-02
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Remove unnecessary from/to-void* and to-void casts in drivers/acpiJan Engelhardt2006-10-14
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.cPatrick Mochel2006-06-27
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: un-export ACPI_WARNING() -- use printk(KERN_WARNING...)Len Brown2006-06-27
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Enable ACPI error messages w/o CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGThomas Renninger2006-06-26
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* [ACPI] make two processor functions staticAdrian Bunk2006-01-08
| | | | | | | | | acpi_processor_write_throttling() acpi_processor_write_limit() Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* [ACPI] move some run-time structure inits to compile timeArjan van de Ven2006-01-07
| | | | | | | | | | | acpi_processor_limit_fops.write was written at run time, but can be initiailized at compile-time instead. Similar for acpi_video_bus_POST_fops.write and friends, but keep doing those at runtime to avoid prototype-hell. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* [ACPI] Lindent all ACPI filesLen Brown2005-08-05
| | | | Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-16
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
generated by cgit v1.2.2 (git 2.25.0) at 2025-02-11 14:33:42 -0500