| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The questions asked in the comments have been answered and addressed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
And rename the initiator mode data exchange ops for consistency sake.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The NFC core code already does that for them.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The variable 'hci_nfc_ops' is only referenced in this file and
should be marked static to prevent it from being exposed globally.
Quites the sparse warning:
warning: symbol 'hci_nfc_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The NFC Core now caches the active nfc target pointer, thereby avoiding
the need to lookup the target table for each invocation of a driver ops.
Consequently, pn533, HCI and NCI now directly receive an nfc_target
pointer instead of a target index.
Cc: Ilan Elias <ilane@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SHDLC link layer of HCI based drivers uses CRC-CCITT and thus
needs to select that kernel option.
Otherwise it ends up with this linking error:
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_shdlc_add_len_crc':
net/nfc/hci/shdlc.c:113: undefined reference to `crc_ccitt'
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most NFC HCI chipsets actually use a simplified HDLC link layer to
carry HCI payloads.
This implementation registers itself as an HCI device on behalf of the
NFC driver.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
|
|
This is an implementation of ETSI TS 102 622 specification.
Many NFC chipsets use HCI as the host <-> target protocol on top of a
serial link like i2c.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
