| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 093d24a20442 ("arm64: PCI: Manage controller-specific data on
per-controller basis") added code to allocate ACPI PCI root_ops
dynamically on a per host bridge basis but failed to update the
corresponding memory allocation failure path in pci_acpi_scan_root()
leading to a potential memory leakage.
Fix it by adding the required kfree call.
Fixes: 093d24a20442 ("arm64: PCI: Manage controller-specific data on per-controller basis")
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Timmy Li <lixiaoping3@huawei.com>
[lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: refactored code, rewrote commit log]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pci_mcfg_lookup() is the external interface to the generic MCFG code.
Previously it merely looked up the ECAM base address for a given domain and
bus range. We want a way to add MCFG quirks, some of which may require
special config accessors and adjustments to the ECAM address range.
Extend pci_mcfg_lookup() so it can return a pointer to a pci_ecam_ops
structure and a struct resource for the ECAM address space. For now, it
always returns &pci_generic_ecam_ops (the standard accessor) and the
resource described by the MCFG.
No functional changes intended.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On x86 and ia64, we have treated all ACPI _CRS resources of PNP0A03 host
bridge devices as "producers", i.e., as host bridge windows. That's partly
because some x86 BIOSes improperly used "consumer" descriptors to describe
windows and partly because Linux didn't have good support for handling
consumer and producer descriptors differently.
One result is that x86 BIOSes describe host bridge "consumer" resources in
the _CRS of a PNP0C02 device, not the PNP0A03 device itself. On arm64 we
don't have a legacy of firmware that has this consumer/producer confusion,
so we can handle PNP0A03 "consumer" descriptors as host bridge registers
instead of windows.
Exclude non-window ("consumer") resources from the list of host bridge
windows. This allows the use of "consumer" PNP0A03 descriptors for bridge
register space.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we use one shared global acpi_pci_root_ops structure to keep
controller-specific ops. We pass its pointer to acpi_pci_root_create() and
associate it with a host bridge instance for good. Such a design implies
serious drawback. Any potential manipulation on the single system-wide
acpi_pci_root_ops leads to kernel crash. The structure content is not
really changing even across multiple host bridges creation; thus it was not
an issue so far.
In preparation for adding ECAM quirks mechanism (where controller-specific
PCI ops may be different for each host bridge) allocate new
acpi_pci_root_ops and fill in with data for each bridge. Now it is safe to
have different controller-specific info. As a consequence free
acpi_pci_root_ops when host bridge is released.
No functional changes in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The static MCFG table tells us the base of ECAM space, but it does not
reserve the space -- the reservation should be done via a device in the
ACPI namespace whose _CRS includes the ECAM region.
Use acpi_resource_consumer() to check whether the ECAM space is reserved by
an ACPI namespace device. If it is, emit a message showing which device
reserves it. If not, emit a "[Firmware Bug]" warning.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use a local "struct device *dev" for brevity. No functional change
intended.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* pci/resource:
unicore32/PCI: Remove pci=firmware command line parameter handling
ARM/PCI: Remove arch-specific pcibios_enable_device()
ARM64/PCI: Remove arch-specific pcibios_enable_device()
MIPS/PCI: Claim bus resources on PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-ups
ARM/PCI: Claim bus resources on PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-ups
PCI: generic: Claim bus resources on PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-ups
PCI: Add generic pci_bus_claim_resources()
alx: Use pci_(request|release)_mem_regions
ethernet/intel: Use pci_(request|release)_mem_regions
GenWQE: Use pci_(request|release)_mem_regions
lpfc: Use pci_(request|release)_mem_regions
NVMe: Use pci_(request|release)_mem_regions
PCI: Add helpers to request/release memory and I/O regions
PCI: Extending pci=resource_alignment to specify device/vendor IDs
sparc/PCI: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
powerpc/pci: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
microblaze/PCI: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
PCI: Unify pci_resource_to_user() declarations
microblaze/PCI: Remove useless __pci_mmap_set_pgprot()
powerpc/pci: Remove __pci_mmap_set_pgprot()
PCI: Ignore write combining when mapping I/O port space
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
On systems with PCI_PROBE_ONLY set, we rely on BAR assignments from
firmware. Previously we did not insert those resources into the resource
tree, so we had to skip pci_enable_resources() because it fails if
resources are not in the resource tree.
Now that we *do* insert resources even when PCI_PROBE_ONLY is set, we no
longer need the ARM64-specific pcibios_enable_device(). Remove it so we
use the generic version.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Implement pci_acpi_scan_root() and other arch-specific calls so ARM64 can
use ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses.
Use memory-mapped configuration space information from either the ACPI
_CBA method or the MCFG table and the ECAM library and generic ECAM config
accessor ops.
Implement acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr() to retrieve the domain number from
the acpi_pci_root structure.
Implement pcibios_add_bus() and pcibios_remove_bus() to call
acpi_pci_add_bus() and acpi_pci_remove_bus() for ACPI slot management and
other configuration.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
On ACPI systems, the PCI_Config OperationRegion allows AML to access PCI
configuration space. The ACPI CA AML interpreter uses performs config
space accesses with acpi_os_read_pci_configuration() and
acpi_os_write_pci_configuration(), which are OS-dependent functions
supplied by acpi/osl.c.
Implement the arch-specific raw_pci_read() and raw_pci_write() interfaces
used by acpi/osl.c for PCI_Config accesses.
N.B. PCI_Config accesses are not supported before PCI bus enumeration.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
To enable PCI legacy IRQs on platforms booting with ACPI, arch code should
include ACPI-specific callbacks that parse and set-up the device IRQ
number, equivalent to the DT boot path. Owing to the current ACPI core scan
handlers implementation, ACPI PCI legacy IRQs bindings cannot be parsed at
device add time, since that would trigger ACPI scan handlers ordering
issues depending on how the ACPI tables are defined.
To solve this problem and consolidate FW PCI legacy IRQs parsing in one
single pcibios callback (pending final removal), this patch moves DT PCI
IRQ parsing to the pcibios_alloc_irq() callback (called by PCI core code at
driver probe time) and adds ACPI PCI legacy IRQs parsing to the same
callback too, so that FW PCI legacy IRQs parsing is confined in one single
arch callback that can be easily removed when code parsing PCI legacy IRQs
is consolidated and moved to core PCI code.
Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extend pci_bus_find_domain_nr() so it can find the domain from either:
- ACPI, via the new acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr() interface, or
- DT, via of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr()
Note that this is only used for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y, so it does
not affect x86 or ia64.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Attempt to get the memory and CPU NUMA node via of_numa. If that
fails, default the dummy NUMA node and map all memory and CPUs to node
0.
Tested-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arm64 generates asm/pci-bridge.h, which merely includes the now-empty
asm-generic/pci-bridge.h. Stop generating asm/pci-bridge.h, and stop
including it.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On ARM64 PROBE_ONLY PCI systems resources are not currently claimed,
therefore they can't be enabled since they do not have a valid
parent pointer; this in turn prevents enabling PCI devices on
ARM64 PROBE_ONLY systems, causing PCI devices initialization to
fail.
To solve this issue, resources must be claimed when devices are
added on PROBE_ONLY systems, which ensures that the resource hierarchy
is validated and the resource tree is sane, but this requires changes
in the ARM64 resource management that can affect adversely existing
PCI set-ups (claiming resources on !PROBE_ONLY systems might break
existing ARM64 PCI platform implementations).
As a temporary solution in preparation for a proper resources claiming
implementation in ARM64 core, to enable PCI PROBE_ONLY systems on ARM64,
this patch adds a pcibios_enable_device() arch implementation that
simply prevents enabling resources on PROBE_ONLY systems (mirroring ARM
behaviour).
This is always a safe thing to do because on PROBE_ONLY systems the
configuration space set-up can be considered immutable, and it is in
preparation of proper resource claiming that would finally validate
the PCI resources tree in the ARM64 arch implementation on PROBE_ONLY
systems.
For !PROBE_ONLY systems resources enablement in pcibios_enable_device()
on ARM64 is implemented as in current PCI core, leaving the behaviour
unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CONFIG_ACPI depends CONFIG_PCI on x86 and ia64, in ARM64 server
world we will have PCIe in most cases, but some of them may not,
make CONFIG_ACPI depend CONFIG_PCI on ARM64 will satisfy both.
With that case, we need some arch dependent PCI functions to
access the config space before the PCI root bridge is created, and
pci_acpi_scan_root() to create the PCI root bus. So introduce
some stub function here to make ACPI core compile and revisit
them later when implemented on ARM64.
CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current logic in arm64 pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() is flawed in that
depending on the host controller configuration for a platform and the
initialization sequence, core code may end up allocating PCI domain numbers
from both DT and the generic domain counter, which would result in PCI
domain allocation aliases/errors.
Fix the logic behind the PCI domain number assignment and move the
resulting code to the PCI core so the same domain allocation logic is used
on all platforms that select CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC.
[bhelgaas: tidy changelog]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
|
Use the generic PCI domain and OF functions to provide support for PCI
on arm64.
[bhelgaas: Change comments to use generic PCI, not just PCIe. Nothing at
this level is PCIe-specific.]
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
