x86/gart: Exclude GART aperture from kcore

On machines where the GART aperture is mapped over physical RAM,
/proc/kcore contains the GART aperture range. Accessing the GART range via
/proc/kcore results in a kernel crash.

vmcore used to have the same issue, until it was fixed with commit
2a3e83c6f96c ("x86/gart: Exclude GART aperture from vmcore")', leveraging
existing hook infrastructure in vmcore to let /proc/vmcore return zeroes
when attempting to read the aperture region, and so it won't read from the
actual memory.

Apply the same workaround for kcore. First implement the same hook
infrastructure for kcore, then reuse the hook functions introduced in the
previous vmcore fix. Just with some minor adjustment, rename some functions
for more general usage, and simplify the hook infrastructure a bit as there
is no module usage yet.

Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190308030508.13548-1-kasong@redhat.com

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index bbcc185062bb..d29d869abec1 100644
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -54,6 +54,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(kclist_lock);
 static int kcore_need_update = 1;
 
+/*
+ * Returns > 0 for RAM pages, 0 for non-RAM pages, < 0 on error
+ * Same as oldmem_pfn_is_ram in vmcore
+ */
+static int (*mem_pfn_is_ram)(unsigned long pfn);
+
+int __init register_mem_pfn_is_ram(int (*fn)(unsigned long pfn))
+{
+        if (mem_pfn_is_ram)
+                return -EBUSY;
+        mem_pfn_is_ram = fn;
+        return 0;
+}
+
+static int pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
+{
+        if (mem_pfn_is_ram)
+                return mem_pfn_is_ram(pfn);
+        else
+                return 1;
+}
+
 /* This doesn't grab kclist_lock, so it should only be used at init time. */
 void __init kclist_add(struct kcore_list *new, void *addr, size_t size,
                        int type)
@@ -465,6 +487,11 @@ read_kcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos)
                                 goto out;
                         }
                         m = NULL;       /* skip the list anchor */
+                } else if (!pfn_is_ram(__pa(start) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
+                        if (clear_user(buffer, tsz)) {
+                                ret = -EFAULT;
+                                goto out;
+                        }
                 } else if (m->type == KCORE_VMALLOC) {
                         vread(buf, (char *)start, tsz);
                         /* we have to zero-fill user buffer even if no read */