fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block()

posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves
nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a
status while the later doesn't.

So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead,
after giving that function an appropriate return value.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 74330daeab71..ea719cdd6a36 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int nlmsvc_unlink_block(struct nlm_block *block)
         dprintk("lockd: unlinking block %p...\n", block);
 
         /* Remove block from list */
-        status = posix_unblock_lock(&block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl);
+        status = locks_delete_block(&block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl);
         nlmsvc_remove_block(block);
         return status;
 }