befs: remove unused BEFS_BT_PARMATCH

befs_btree_find(), the only caller of befs_find_key(), only cares about if
the return from that function is BEFS_BT_MATCH or not. It never uses the
partial match given with BEFS_BT_PARMATCH. Make the overflow return clearer
by having BEFS_BT_OVERFLOW instead of BEFS_BT_PARMATCH.

Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/fs/befs/btree.c b/fs/befs/btree.c
index 3f1a39166d89..5670d845b2ef 100644
--- a/fs/befs/btree.c
+++ b/fs/befs/btree.c
@@ -281,9 +281,9 @@ befs_btree_find(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *ds,
 
         while (!befs_leafnode(this_node)) {
                 res = befs_find_key(sb, this_node, key, &node_off);
-                if (res == BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND)
+                /* if no key set, try the overflow node */
+                if (res == BEFS_BT_OVERFLOW)
                         node_off = this_node->head.overflow;
-                /* if no match, go to overflow node */
                 if (befs_bt_read_node(sb, ds, this_node, node_off) != BEFS_OK) {
                         befs_error(sb, "befs_btree_find() failed to read "
                                    "node at %llu", node_off);
@@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ befs_btree_find(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *ds,
                 }
         }
 
-        /* at the correct leaf node now */
-
+        /* at a leaf node now, check if it is correct */
         res = befs_find_key(sb, this_node, key, value);
 
         brelse(this_node->bh);
@@ -323,16 +322,12 @@ befs_btree_find(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *ds,
  * @findkey: Keystring to search for
  * @value: If key is found, the value stored with the key is put here
  *
- * finds exact match if one exists, and returns BEFS_BT_MATCH
- * If no exact match, finds first key in node that is greater
- * (alphabetically) than the search key and returns BEFS_BT_PARMATCH
- * (for partial match, I guess). Can you think of something better to
- * call it?
- *
- * If no key was a match or greater than the search key, return
- * BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND.
+ * Finds exact match if one exists, and returns BEFS_BT_MATCH.
+ * If there is no match and node's value array is too small for key, return
+ * BEFS_BT_OVERFLOW.
+ * If no match and node should countain this key, return BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND.
  *
- * Use binary search instead of a linear.
+ * Uses binary search instead of a linear.
  */
 static int
 befs_find_key(struct super_block *sb, struct befs_btree_node *node,
@@ -355,9 +350,8 @@ befs_find_key(struct super_block *sb, struct befs_btree_node *node,
 
         eq = befs_compare_strings(thiskey, keylen, findkey, findkey_len);
         if (eq < 0) {
-                befs_error(sb, "<--- %s %s not found", __func__, findkey);
-                befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s ERROR", __func__);
-                return BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND;
+                befs_debug(sb, "<--- node can't contain %s", findkey);
+                return BEFS_BT_OVERFLOW;
         }
 
         valarray = befs_bt_valarray(node);
@@ -385,12 +379,15 @@ befs_find_key(struct super_block *sb, struct befs_btree_node *node,
                 else
                         first = mid + 1;
         }
+
+        /* return an existing value so caller can arrive to a leaf node */
         if (eq < 0)
                 *value = fs64_to_cpu(sb, valarray[mid + 1]);
         else
                 *value = fs64_to_cpu(sb, valarray[mid]);
-        befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s found %s at %d", __func__, thiskey, mid);
-        return BEFS_BT_PARMATCH;
+        befs_error(sb, "<--- %s %s not found", __func__, findkey);
+        befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s ERROR", __func__);
+        return BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND;
 }
 
 /**