From bc28df6e8543d41abfb48d4a4c6d445638d6768c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: net: dccp: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that for options.c file, I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/dccp/options.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/dccp/options.c') diff --git a/net/dccp/options.c b/net/dccp/options.c index 51cdfc3bd8ca..4e40db017e19 100644 --- a/net/dccp/options.c +++ b/net/dccp/options.c @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq, * Ack vectors are processed by the TX CCID if it is * interested. The RX CCID need not parse Ack Vectors, * since it is only interested in clearing old state. - * Fall through. */ + /* fall through */ case DCCPO_MIN_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC ... DCCPO_MAX_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC: if (ccid_hc_tx_parse_options(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, pkt_type, opt, value, len)) -- cgit v1.2.2