1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/init.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/init.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e89d97f31eaf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/init.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+Explaining the dreaded "No init found." boot hang message
+=========================================================
+
+OK, so you've got this pretty unintuitive message (currently located
+in init/main.c) and are wondering what the H*** went wrong.
+Some high-level reasons for failure (listed roughly in order of execution)
+to load the init binary are:
+
+A) Unable to mount root FS
+B) init binary doesn't exist on rootfs
+C) broken console device
+D) binary exists but dependencies not available
+E) binary cannot be loaded
+
+Detailed explanations:
+
+A) Set "debug" kernel parameter (in bootloader config file or CONFIG_CMDLINE)
+   to get more detailed kernel messages.
+B) make sure you have the correct root FS type
+   (and ``root=`` kernel parameter points to the correct partition),
+   required drivers such as storage hardware (such as SCSI or USB!)
+   and filesystem (ext3, jffs2 etc.) are builtin (alternatively as modules,
+   to be pre-loaded by an initrd)
+C) Possibly a conflict in ``console= setup`` --> initial console unavailable.
+   E.g. some serial consoles are unreliable due to serial IRQ issues (e.g.
+   missing interrupt-based configuration).
+   Try using a different ``console= device`` or e.g. ``netconsole=``.
+D) e.g. required library dependencies of the init binary such as
+   ``/lib/ld-linux.so.2`` missing or broken. Use
+   ``readelf -d <INIT>|grep NEEDED`` to find out which libraries are required.
+E) make sure the binary's architecture matches your hardware.
+   E.g. i386 vs. x86_64 mismatch, or trying to load x86 on ARM hardware.
+   In case you tried loading a non-binary file here (shell script?),
+   you should make sure that the script specifies an interpreter in its shebang
+   header line (``#!/...``) that is fully working (including its library
+   dependencies). And before tackling scripts, better first test a simple
+   non-script binary such as ``/bin/sh`` and confirm its successful execution.
+   To find out more, add code ``to init/main.c`` to display kernel_execve()s
+   return values.
+
+Please extend this explanation whenever you find new failure causes
+(after all loading the init binary is a CRITICAL and hard transition step
+which needs to be made as painless as possible), then submit patch to LKML.
+Further TODOs:
+
+- Implement the various ``run_init_process()`` invocations via a struct array
+  which can then store the ``kernel_execve()`` result value and on failure
+  log it all by iterating over **all** results (very important usability fix).
+- try to make the implementation itself more helpful in general,
+  e.g. by providing additional error messages at affected places.
+
+Andreas Mohr <andi at lisas period de>