rhashtable: Do not lower max_elems when max_size is zero

The commit 6d684e54690c ("rhashtable: Cap total number of entries
to 2^31") breaks rhashtable users that do not set max_size.  This
is because when max_size is zero max_elems is also incorrectly set
to zero instead of 2^31.

This patch fixes it by only lowering max_elems when max_size is not
zero.

Fixes: 6d684e54690c ("rhashtable: Cap total number of entries to 2^31")
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index 751630bbe409..3895486ef551 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -958,13 +958,14 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht,
         if (params->min_size)
                 ht->p.min_size = roundup_pow_of_two(params->min_size);
 
-        if (params->max_size)
-                ht->p.max_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(params->max_size);
-
         /* Cap total entries at 2^31 to avoid nelems overflow. */
         ht->max_elems = 1u << 31;
-        if (ht->p.max_size < ht->max_elems / 2)
-                ht->max_elems = ht->p.max_size * 2;
+
+        if (params->max_size) {
+                ht->p.max_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(params->max_size);
+                if (ht->p.max_size < ht->max_elems / 2)
+                        ht->max_elems = ht->p.max_size * 2;
+        }
 
         ht->p.min_size = max(ht->p.min_size, HASH_MIN_SIZE);