clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 66f829c47bec..d7449783987a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int __init set_tracepoint_printk(char *str)
 }
 __setup("tp_printk", set_tracepoint_printk);
 
-unsigned long long ns2usecs(cycle_t nsec)
+unsigned long long ns2usecs(u64 nsec)
 {
         nsec += 500;
         do_div(nsec, 1000);
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ int trace_pid_write(struct trace_pid_list *filtered_pids,
         return read;
 }
 
-static cycle_t buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu)
+static u64 buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu)
 {
         u64 ts;
 
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static cycle_t buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu)
         return ts;
 }
 
-cycle_t ftrace_now(int cpu)
+u64 ftrace_now(int cpu)
 {
         return buffer_ftrace_now(&global_trace.trace_buffer, cpu);
 }