ocfs2: use 'oi' instead of 'OCFS2_I()'

We could use 'oi' instead of 'OCFS2_I()' to make code more elegant.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5A7020FE.5050906@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 9a876bb07cac..0f157bbd3e0f 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -7119,7 +7119,7 @@ int ocfs2_convert_inline_data_to_extents(struct inode *inode,
                         goto out_commit;
                 did_quota = 1;
 
-                data_ac->ac_resv = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_la_data_resv;
+                data_ac->ac_resv = &oi->ip_la_data_resv;
 
                 ret = ocfs2_claim_clusters(handle, data_ac, 1, &bit_off,
                                            &num);