dm ioctl: drop use of __GFP_REPEAT in copy_params()'s __vmalloc() call

copy_params()'s use of __GFP_REPEAT for the __vmalloc() call doesn't make much
sense because vmalloc doesn't rely on costly high order allocations.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
index 2adf81d81fca..2c7ca258c4e4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static int copy_params(struct dm_ioctl __user *user, struct dm_ioctl *param_kern
         if (!dmi) {
                 unsigned noio_flag;
                 noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
-                dmi = __vmalloc(param_kernel->data_size, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_HIGHMEM, PAGE_KERNEL);
+                dmi = __vmalloc(param_kernel->data_size, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_HIGHMEM, PAGE_KERNEL);
                 memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
                 if (dmi)
                         *param_flags |= DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC;