signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault

The __do_user_fault function is always called with tsk == current.
Make that obvious by removing the tsk parameter.

This makes it clear that __do_user_fault calls force_sig_fault
on the current task.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index 58f69fa07df9..324def0279b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -157,10 +157,11 @@ __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
  * User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV
  */
 static void
-__do_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
-                unsigned int fsr, unsigned int sig, int code,
-                struct pt_regs *regs)
+__do_user_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, unsigned int sig,
+                int code, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+        struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+
         if (addr > TASK_SIZE)
                 harden_branch_predictor();
 
@@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ void do_bad_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
          * have no context to handle this fault with.
          */
         if (user_mode(regs))
-                __do_user_fault(tsk, addr, fsr, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, regs);
+                __do_user_fault(addr, fsr, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, regs);
         else
                 __do_kernel_fault(mm, addr, fsr, regs);
 }
@@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ retry:
                         SEGV_ACCERR : SEGV_MAPERR;
         }
 
-        __do_user_fault(tsk, addr, fsr, sig, code, regs);
+        __do_user_fault(addr, fsr, sig, code, regs);
         return 0;
 
 no_context: