locking/core: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency() users

With the s390 special case of a yielding cpu_relax() implementation gone,
we can now remove all users of cpu_relax_lowlatency() and replace them
with cpu_relax().

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477386195-32736-5-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

8 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 8832f8ec1583..383d13416442 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ bool __i915_spin_request(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
                 if (busywait_stop(timeout_us, cpu))
                         break;
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         } while (!need_resched());
 
         return false;
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 5dc128a8da83..5dc34653274a 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
                 endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
                 while (vhost_can_busy_poll(vq->dev, endtime) &&
                        vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq))
-                        cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                        cpu_relax();
                 preempt_enable();
                 r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
                                       out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk)
                 while (vhost_can_busy_poll(&net->dev, endtime) &&
                        !sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
                        vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
-                        cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                        cpu_relax();
 
                 preempt_enable();
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index c835270f0c2f..6a385aabcce7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
 #define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)                                 \
 do {                                                                    \
         while (!(smp_load_acquire(l)))                                  \
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();                                 \
+                cpu_relax();                                            \
 } while (0)
 #endif
 
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
                         return;
                 /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
                 while (!(next = READ_ONCE(node->next)))
-                        cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                        cpu_relax();
         }
 
         /* Pass lock to next waiter. */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 17a88e929e6a..a65e09a046ac 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
                         break;
                 }
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
         rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock,
                  * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
                  * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
                  */
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
 
         if (!waiter)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index 05a37857ab55..4ea2710b9d6c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
                                 break;
                 }
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
 
         return next;
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
                 if (need_resched())
                         goto unqueue;
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
         return true;
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ unqueue:
                 if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
                         return true;
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
 
                 /*
                  * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index 19248ddf37ce..cc3ed0ccdfa2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static __always_inline void
 rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
 {
         while ((cnts & _QW_WMASK) == _QW_LOCKED) {
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
                 cnts = atomic_read_acquire(&lock->cnts);
         }
 }
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
                    (cmpxchg_relaxed(&l->wmode, 0, _QW_WAITING) == 0))
                         break;
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
 
         /* When no more readers, set the locked flag */
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
                                             _QW_LOCKED) == _QW_WAITING))
                         break;
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
 unlock:
         arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 2337b4bb2366..2fa2e2e64950 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
                         return false;
                 }
 
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
         rcu_read_unlock();
 out:
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
                  * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
                  * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
                  */
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+                cpu_relax();
         }
         osq_unlock(&sem->osq);
 done:
diff --git a/lib/lockref.c b/lib/lockref.c
index 5a92189ad711..c4bfcb8836cd 100644
--- a/lib/lockref.c
+++ b/lib/lockref.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
                 if (likely(old.lock_count == prev.lock_count)) {                \
                         SUCCESS;                                                \
                 }                                                               \
-                cpu_relax_lowlatency();                                         \
+                cpu_relax();                                                    \
         }                                                                       \
 } while (0)