fs/jfs: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev() checks

new_valid_dev() always returns 1, so the !new_valid_dev() checks are not
needed.  Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
index 35976bdccafc..9d7551f5c32a 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
@@ -1372,9 +1372,6 @@ static int jfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
         tid_t tid;
         struct tblock *tblk;
 
-        if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
-                return -EINVAL;
-
         jfs_info("jfs_mknod: %pd", dentry);
 
         rc = dquot_initialize(dir);
diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
index 4cd9798f4948..8f9176caf098 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
@@ -496,9 +496,6 @@ static int jfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 
         jfs_info("In jfs_read_super: s_flags=0x%lx", sb->s_flags);
 
-        if (!new_valid_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev))
-                return -EOVERFLOW;
-
         sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jfs_sb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
         if (!sbi)
                 return -ENOMEM;